Managed Deployment is the project service for teams that need trust-boundary design, multi-gateway thinking, deeper hardening, and operational readiness instead of a simple first install.
Teams with multiple departments, higher-risk data handling, more demanding channel setups, or a stronger expectation of launch discipline.
When one gateway and a quick handoff are not enough, this package adds trust-boundary design, rollout control, and a proper operator handoff.
Starter Setup is for the first install. Managed Deployment is for the project that has more moving pieces and needs tighter control.
Where platform behavior matters, we align the service scope to the official OpenClaw docs rather than inventing unsupported patterns.
We map the trust boundaries, gateway count, data flows, and the places where a quick install would create future pain.
We implement the environment with the right security posture, operator access, and a monitored baseline that matches the risk level.
You get the rollout support, runbook, and operational guidance needed to keep the deployment stable after the project is done.
Most Managed Deployment projects run 2-4 weeks depending on gateway count, channel complexity, and the level of rollout coordination required.
The public range is $8,000-$25,000. The quote moves inside that band based on trust boundaries, channel count, monitoring depth, current deployment state, and whether the rollout includes handoff-only or retained support planning.
Send the real deployment facts and I will route it to the right service path instead of making you guess.
No. It is also for existing deployments that need better trust-boundary design, stronger hardening, or a cleaner rollout path before they become harder to manage.
Usually one to three, depending on trust boundaries, team separation, and how much isolation the deployment actually needs. We do not force a single gateway where separation is safer.
The basics: who will use it, what has to stay separate, what is already live, where it is hosted, and what problems are making the current setup risky or awkward.
The project includes rollout support and a proper handoff. If you want ongoing maintenance, monitoring, or future updates, that belongs in Ongoing Care instead of this one-off package.
Because the work is more constrained and more expensive to get right: more architecture review, more rollout coordination, more hardening, and more time spent making sure the system is safe to hand off.
Yes. That is one of the main reasons this service exists. We can review the current state, tighten the boundaries, and turn a rough setup into something operators can actually manage.